Filed under: Contemporary Art | Tags: Altermodern, Designer Fetish, Dispersion, ICA, Nicolas Bourriaud, Postmodern, Seth Price, tate, Tate Triennial

Quite similar to the Tate Triennial installation, but not it
That French guy who invented ‘Relational Aesthetics’ (the art theory based on a period of sustained economic growth and a rising art market, where everyone pretended that they weren’t trying to sell something to some rich man with hands on his face, YOU CAN’T BUY YOUTH OLD MAN, BUY ANOTHER HOUSE OH NO, PROPERTY MARKET CRASHED NEVER MIND) has curated a show based on a new made up word (my favourite recent made up word is ‘Factiality’, but that is another kettle of theory entirely, and is technically a translation of a French term {always French, why is that?}), ‘Altermodern’. Altermodernism is an, ‘in-progress redefinition of modernity in the era of globalisation’. Not entirely untrue I suppose, but entirely unnecessary.
But someone else can do the review. I would simply like to ask a question’. And that question is, what the fuck Seth Price?
What the fuck is on the wall Seth Price? What the fuck is it made of? And what the fuck is it meant to be?
Oh right Seth Price, ‘images from the internet … cut from luxuriously exotic wood and coated in plastics to create works resembling bespoke design objects’.
What the fuck Seth Price?
Check Seth Prices website
You can download a lot of his essays, there are links to websites he is involved with, and a link to rent his films (though $50 seems a bit shit for a film without a proper story, know what I mean? Not like ‘The Crying Game’! Crazy shit man, I won’t spoil the ending. IT SINKS! I’m joking, that is the ending to ‘Titanic’, another must see. I saw it three times, by accident! Weird eh? First time I held a girls hand in the dark, second time I shouted, ‘LOOK AT THOSE BANGERS!’ when Winslet got her brags out, and the third time was with my parents, and nothing interesting happened). This is all presented in that affected, ms-dos, no fuss, geek-retro-web style we all love.
Also, one of his essays, ‘Dispersion’, is the basis for a group exhibition at the ICA, in which Seth Price took part. I won’t quote it (or bother to re-read it), but it has some interesting ideas about using capitalist modes of mass distribution to subvert the system of an object obsessed art market. Good idea. The film shown in the exhibition was on unlimited, low cost distribution, and featured a mashing together of loads of his previous video work. I like that lack of respect for your own art work, and the attitude to making work in general.
Let me just re-quote the blurb for the piece at Altermodern
‘images from the internet … cut from luxuriously exotic wood and coated in plastics to create works resembling bespoke design objects’.
What the fuck Seth Price?
This seems exactly like the sort of dead-end Post-modernism that Bourriaud is so smug about finishing off. The sort of art market, object-fetish, money-critical work that people have made for the last ten years without any sort of perspective on the ribs they must have had removed to make such a horrific position possible.

Again, not
They don’t resemble bespoke design objects Seth Price. They are bespoke designer objects. ‘Exotic’ wood just means rare and expensive wood. And no one gives a shit that the images are ‘ripped’ from the internet. I didn’t even know what they were (though, I didn’t look at them for very long, so they might be LOLCATZ!!! Who knows?), and where do you think designers get their ideas from? They don’t just magic the little bastards out of thin air. Pointing out the lack of originality in the culture/design industry is just massaging an over worked tautology. Seth Price, you are making the meaning explicit to the viewer in the worst possible way. They are from a private collection, which is fine, art is sold and bought, but you have made an aesthetic object, to be bought. You have then half-charged it with ‘concept’, so the collector can feel clever, while looking at a lovely, abstract, wall hanging. It is at odds with what you write in, ‘Dispersion’, and like a lot of the work in this exhibition, it is completely at odds with even the possibility of a, ‘re-definition of modernism’.
What the fuck Seth Price?
What the fuck Nicolas Bourriaud?
What the fuck, everyone.
Quotes from ‘Altermodern: Exhibition Guide’.
www.dekersaint.co.uk
12 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
I think that Nicolas Bourriaud created really a boring display out of good artists, he wants to be at the middle of the attention when it is the single artists, who should receive the attention. I agree, the work of Seth price was, like much of the work in there unanimously meaningless, like the title of the exhibition .
Comment by frianne 13 February 2009 @ 4:26 pmI don’t think Bourriaud really understands postmodernism which has a much more global ambit than NC allows, so that announcing a following movement or style is also flawed.
But nice try Frenchie.
As for Seth, maybe he should change his name to Sayeth Price.
Comment by CAP 15 February 2009 @ 1:16 pmBourriaud made a bad display out of mainly bad art (the best piece by Gustav Metzger is actually from the 1960s but has been wrongly dated 2005 – when it was remade for the Tate Liverpool Summer of Love exhibition – to shoe-horn it in), but other people from the Tate seem to have cleaned it up the installation a little. It looked a lot cleaner on an individual room by room assessment than Bourriaud’s terrible and rather messy Lyon biennial of a few years back (or anything you’ve ever seen at the crappy the Palais de Tokyo in Paris which he and Jerôme Sans are responsibly for). Likewise, Bourriaud doesn’t seem to understand modernism or modernity, let alone postmodernism, but it doesn’t matter to him, all he wants are a few buzz words to link a load junk together.
Comment by Mister Trippy 15 February 2009 @ 4:23 pmStonking review here by Waldemar http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/article5670577.ece
Comment by annartist 15 February 2009 @ 11:20 pmAnd WTF didn’t anyone point out to Nick that Altermodernism is like, severely naff as a name?
What was wrong with just Globalism, old Nick? Link the thing upfront to the whole sad economic era. How fucking relational is that?
Comment by CAP 16 February 2009 @ 12:37 pmI’m a terrorist BTW.
Comment by CAP 16 February 2009 @ 12:39 pmI think it may well be the business of defining artists as part of a movement that is ‘naff’ (someone said ‘pukka’ to me the other day and I almost shit myself it had been that long since I’d heard it).
Post-modernism is often described as a condition. In truth, post-modernism recognises that it is a critique of what has passed, as well as a problem, and a way of solving problems. As long as we don’t slip in to relativism and tail-chasing impotence (How is that for a mixed metaphor?) I’m happy to be part of Post-modernism, as long as we don’t ever use the word naff ever again…
Comment by seth price 16 February 2009 @ 9:19 pm‘Naff’ ‘pukka’- you’ve got to realise that Jamie F Oliver is the guiding spirit of our age SP.
Also note distinction between postmodernism as an intellectual doctrine and Post Modernism as a period style. Old Nick doesn’t really appreciate the difference, which is part of his problem.
Altermodernism is shit as a label (functionally) folly as history (stylistically).
Beow-Chikka-Wah-Wah!
Comment by CAP 17 February 2009 @ 2:23 pmAn interesting article to bear in mind when writing criticism
http://www.frieze.com/blog/entry/altercritics/
Comment by jiminy cricket 18 February 2009 @ 3:25 pmyes indeedy Jiminy
Comment by annartist 18 February 2009 @ 3:33 pmShit. I went to this show twice, and didn’t even notice Seth Price’s work. Guess that says it all. It’s a patchy old show, but there were a couple of gems along with the dross:
Comment by Russell 18 February 2009 @ 10:18 pmhttp://www.urbanlandfill.co.uk/2009/02/altermodern-tate-britain-london.html
Seth price is a good artist and writer but those are his weakest works. He was far, far better in Dispersion but that is one of his best works as is the essay that inspired the ICA show. Hats off everyone there. I think most are on the money here with regards to Bourriaud and his British Art Triennial (let’s call it by what it actually is shall we). BUT again he’s a clever sod is Nicholas. Just seem to be somehow knowing that there is an underlying current of wanting to go beyoind post mod and identity art and when someone finally gets past it with a real idea and not just a feeling and a bad -ism moniker you can say you were there first. I suspect that’s how relational aesthetics acme about but in Australia where I’m from art kiddies around the country still buy ice creams and give them to strangers…and that IS pukka!
Comment by scott redford 26 February 2009 @ 12:24 pm